A group of adolescents (12 - 21 yr, 42% were college graduates) were asked to go to both Subway and McDonald's on different days of the week and purchase whatever they liked, using their own money. It turns out that they bought meals of similar number of calories from both fast food outlets! Purchases from Subway averaged 955 calories; McDonald's averaged 1038 calories. Technically speaking, the calorie intake was not significantly different.
Let's have a look at the breakdown of averages:
Subway (kcal)
|
McDonald's (kcal)
|
|
SANDWICH
|
784
|
572*
|
DRINK
|
61
|
151
|
SIDES
(chips, fries, veggie cups)
|
35
|
201
|
I've excluded non-significant differences such as condiments and desserts, which is why it doesn't add up to the average number of calories.
In terms of nutrient analysis (averages):
Subway
|
McDonald's
|
|
CARBOHYDRATES
|
102 g
|
128 g
|
PROTEIN
|
41 g
|
32 g
|
SUGAR
|
36 g
|
54 g
|
SODIUM
|
2,149 mg
|
1,829 mg
|
Even though Subway is marketed as a "healthy" alternative for fast-food, the shredded lettuce and 2 slices of tomato don't add much nutritional value over the single lettuce and tomato at McD's. However, this is not to say McD's is superior to Subway. The study failed to show a more detailed analysis for cholesterol and other vitamins/minerals - an important aspect to consider when judging which one is the winner.
So, which would you opt for?
Sources:
- Lesser, L. I., Kayekjian, K., Velasquez, P., Tseng, C., Brook, R. H., & Cohen, D. A. (2013). Adolescent purchasing behavior at McDonald's and Subway. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.014
- Health Canada. (2009). Sodium (Catalogue #H13-7/71-2012E-PDF). Retrieved from http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/alt_formats/pdf/iyh-vsv/food-aliment/sodium-eng.pdf
and here i thought i was making a "better choice" with subway.. sigh.
ReplyDelete